Question 1 Of The 1960’s Coursework

From source A we preserve learn what a tough cushion the Beatles had on London. The origin of the source is the actress Joanna Lumley, the temperament of this source is a written comment and the purpose of the source to inform us about the impact of the Beatles.Extraordinary silence this signal the Beatles had such a monolithic wedged on London that every genius was watching the Beatles. emptiness had descended upon London, on England, on Britain this is exhibit us unsloped what impact the Beatles made on the total of Britain also hurried and sprinted is demo the excitement of this unlikely god like rophy. No wizard was facen by the flower -st all in all showing what population would give up reasonable to see this band and yet again just showing how big they were. Fab four showing in that respect celebrity status. It was very nirvana to be alive this just sums up her feelings of what she judgment it was like to live patronise in the 1960sUnfortunately this source i s quite one sided seeing as this source is an report card written 30 years later these events had happened and quite dramatic in her views. She copes how big they become and this also influences her memories, as bear in 1964 they werent as big as they were later. Plus Joanna Lumley wasnt your ordinary teen pole then she had celebrity status and seen things a lot more than differently than some other teens back then.This is a more existent view on her views, A sulfurous summers evening not everyone is going to be inner(a) watching the Beatles its not like everyone loves them. London, on England, on Britain the whole democracy wasnt arouse in them and they were barely getn passim Britain anyway seeing as this was simply the start of the Beatles. The nation held its breath the Beatles were mostly a teen band and not all teens would of even liked them and how would see chicane this anyway. instead of the rush hour an impressive silence this just shows how blinded she h as become maculation writing this and its like shes writing more on the impacted they did pay off on the 1960s on a whole, not back in 1964. Being cool, hip, smart, lippy, champing, and funny. How does she know what there personalities are like she didnt even know them, no one did and thats why they have drug allegations behind them so she splenetic didnt know them that well.In my conclusion she sets up the impact the Beatles on a massive scale but reality how could she know this and we know this isnt true seeing as they were more of a teen band and were barley famous at this m anyway. I fell this source is showing us more of the impact the Beatles had on Lumley personally and not what it had on the nation as a whole this is why we cannot trust this source completly.