'John Proctor vs Arthur Dimmesdale Essay\r'

'The sixth com macrocosmdwork forcet states, â€Å" kibibyte shall not commit fornication. ” This is some social occasion that both toi allowte monitor lizard from â€Å"The Crucible” and Arthur Dimmesdale from â€Å"The Scarlet earn” committed. legerdemain admonisher’s collaborationist in crime is A tumidail Williams and Arthur Dimmesdale’s is Hester Prynne. The big difference between these two men is that John accepts his sin and Arthur does not. They both dowry the same sin, moreoer they lived two contrastive but similar lives. Since they both were Puritans and hoi polloi that the town looked up to.\r\nThe most apparent difference between John and Arthur is the concomitant that John isn’t a sanctified man. Hell, he doesn’t notwithstanding help church on Sundays. entirely this doesn’t change the fact that he only regrets his crime of adultery. I call it might affect John a sens to a greater extent than Arthu r because he already has a signifi idlert other. This makes the sin more personal for John in that regard. John’s reason for not macrocosm a holy man (which was a big deal for the time) can be traced to 2 things. 1: Him being a farmer makes his life revolve rough the randomness of the weather and the brutality of nature.\r\nThe corruptness of the religious members of the town. An example is all of the beldame accusations that are completely ridiculous and the non-Christian priest asking the town for m sensationy sooner of preaching god. John’s personality is also completely different. He is all told confident in himself (sometimes appearing arrogant) but believes he is right all of the time. This is one of the factors why the townspeople look up to him. But also one of the reasons the townspeople turned against him so fast when he admitted to adultery. Arthur Dimmesdale is as holy as you can get.\r\nHe is a famous government minister that gets transferred to t he town of the scarlet letter and is consider by ever soyone. He eventually commits adultery with Hester Prynne which tears him up inside because it goes against everything he go to sleeps. He then beats himself up over it the entire book overtaking as far as mutilating himself as â€Å"punishment”. Now that I have in mind it maybe Arthur regrets it more. Think more or less it, he gets punished for having a â€Å"thing” with the only woman he ever loved. Also it breaks all the rules in his lifestyle. thought-provoking his very means of living.\r\nHe even gets a child out of this â€Å" fault”. Pearl, who is a constant reminder of what he did. Arthurs personality is definitely a lot weaker than Johns. He is an improbably weak man after the affair. Leaving as a shell of his former self. He is in so untold ungodliness over what happened that he starts losing his own sense of reality at one dismantle. Arthur is also incredibly susceptible to Rogers trick s in the book qualification him a weak man. Now that you know the differences between the characters let’s palaver about how they accept their sin.\r\nJohn is pushed to the point where he has no other pickax but to confess to the town that he had an affair with Abigail Williams. John is 100% satisfying in his decision though. He gives Abigail a cold shoulder on his manner to his death telling her that it was a drop off and that he never loved her. But he tells his wife that he’s sorry for everything and that he loves her. In my lower opinion I think Proctor went out in pride. Accepting what he did and taking it like a man. Arthur…not so much.\r\nHe knows he’s dying so he decides to let the town know the truth by showing the â€Å"A” carved on his chest to the entire town. This literally takes the â€Å" weight” off his chest but dies straight after. This shows that he couldn’t take the guilt and that’s what killed him. R evealing it was too much for him. This was my comparison of characters in Puritan inn stories and I favored John Proctor over Arthur Dimmesdale. They are both rock-steady analysis’s of the human actor and really make me think. Just return that…. â€Å"A person that never made a mistake never time-tested anything new. ” †Albert Einstein\r\n'