Paying Division One Athletes

ENG 100P April 12, 2013 Pay to Play Should grade One College Athletes be Paid? all(prenominal) class variableness wizness college supporters localise everything they have on the line during recitation every solar day and make hundreds of one thousand millions of dollars for their take aims and the NCAA every year. These athletes bent fairish describeing for the love of the wager any(prenominal)more once they r apiece the persona unrivalled level, it turns into more of a cheat than an activity. The workers spend hours every single day dedicating al around all of their age to the gas they play.These athletes work just as spacious and a good deal harder than your average person functional a nine to five job, so wherefore forefathert the athletes get off paying(a) for their commit manpowerts to their aggroups? Last year the NCAA do 871. 6 million dollars from variableness mavin boasts. The average sh are hotshot custodys football team brings in 15. 8 million dollars to their naturalise each year. The amount of m iodiney that these blows make for their school is so high the players should get both(prenominal) kind of reward for all they do for their schools.The old rules that say college athletes laughingstockt be paid in any federal agency needs to change, naval division adept college athletes merit to be paid for all they do for the NCAA and their schools. Growing up every athletes dreams of playing in that study championship game for their dream school and scoring the winning touchdown or extra judgment of conviction goal. As a child you wear outt realize that freight it takes to be part of a division one athletic team. Coming from a wide-ranging lacrosse and football town, my friends and I have gone(a) through the division one recruiting dish out and have it off how hard it is to play a division one sport.Many of my spurter teammates play division one lacrosse and later on talk to them I realized really ho w backbreaking it is to play a division one sport. When asked about how lacrosse at Sacred kernel University was going, Freshman Spencer Hackett said Ive fully grown up with lacrosse and I love the sport very ofttimes, but division one is so much more and thusly I thought it would be. Everyday I have deuce practices that last at least two hour, then by and by that I have mandatory scam and film sessions. Spencer holds at least six hours every day for his team, and theyre one of the lowest ranked teams in division one, I shtup only create by mental act the commitment it takes to play on a high ranked team. In my personalized experience of going through the division one recruiting process, I saw how much blood sweat and tears go into being a division one athlete. On my overnight visit at University of Massachusetts, which is a top 20 team, most of my day was watching the team practice, or lift, or watch film.It seemed like everything they did was rotated around lacrosse and to me thats not what college is about. These division one athletes have such brusque time to socialize and make friends outside of their sports everything they do is revolved around their sports. The feature that athletes willingly dedicate so much time to their sports is a huge flat coat why they should be paid. Division one play, especially sports such as football and basketball, are extremely profitable for the NCAA and for their schools. correspond to NCAA. org, the NCAAs revenue for the 2011-2012 athletic seasons was 871. million dollars. The NCAA makes an extremely large amount of property from division athletic competition, with most of the money advance from television contracts and championships such as marchland Madness. Schools such as Texas make hundreds of millions of dollars because of their justice in many sports, last year their football team profited $68,830,484. A spread of the money schools make, such as Texas, is from change merchandise. Big name schools sell lashings of merchandise to the public selling products such as jerseys should be illegal if they players shamt get paid.Why could they sell jerseys with players account on them but that player doesnt get compensated for using their bit on the jersey? Robert and Amy McCormick of Michigan pronounce University have added a new place to the long debate over nonrecreational athletes by arguing they are employees downstairs federal labor laws and entitled to form unions and negotiate wages, hours and working conditions. Robert McCormick was the former attorney for the Nation Labor Relations come along and if he is saying that these players are employees, its about time that the NCAA recognizes them as employees also.A customary logical end against paying college athletes is that they wint compete as hard because it wont be the same as when they werent getting paid, but that argument has absolutely nothing to do with paying players. If anything, paying the pla yers would make them work harder so that they could make more money I conceive that the best way to go about paying these players would be contracts, just like the original athletes and like any other employee in the United States.These contracts would go on to say that the players would be paid an amount depending on their contribution to the team and that students would need to finish their schooling so that they have a backup purpose. That is why youre supposed to go to college in the first place, isnt it? So that you can get a good education To do this the NCAA would need the support from the professional sport teams and not draft players who havent graduated college yet. Another argument why players shouldnt be paid to play is because they students-athletes and that there is a resolveableness student becomes before athletes.Realistically, these young men and women arent student-athletes at all. Many of the players on division one team would neer have gotten into college if it werent for sports. Also, if they are student-athletes then where do they find the time to do their schoolwork when they have practice, film, lifting, running etcetera all day? The only reason many athletes go to college is so that they can get looks from the pros. If they are student-athletes then why do many of them leave college after a year or two to play professional sport?Its because college is just a stepping-stone to them, they dont care about the school aspect. When it comes to division one athletes, they are athletes first and students second. The players k directly it, the coaches know it, the fans know it, the only mass who dont know it are the people who make up the NCAA. In conclusion, times have changed and its time to pay division one athletes for their commitment and for the money they bring in for the schools and the NCAA. With college athletics competition being so forged now and so competitive, players have to dedicate so much more time to their sports t hen in the past.College athletics are not longer a sport that players do for fun, college athletics are now a job for the players that consists of hours of practice unremarkable and throwing your social life out for your sports college athletics make hundreds of millions of dollars for the NCAA and tens of millions of dollars for the schools, so why is it that these players dont get compensated for their commitment and contribution to the schools and the NCAA? I personally believe that it is ridiculous that players dont get paid anymore.One of my best friends Dylan Baumgardner, a lacrosse player at Quinnipiac University said it perfectly when asked if he still loved playing lacrosse, I dont play lacrosse anymore, I go to class, then I go to work all day, then I go to sleep. Joe Nocera of the New York Times, came up with a plan for college athletics that would make college athletics work like professional sports with signing bonuses, salary caps, insurance, player unions and it w ould even endure additional scholarships to players who want to further their education. This plan will go into consideration in 2014.